\n<\/p>\n
NEW YORK — <\/span>For a quarter century, Jane Calvert has been on a mission shared by few scholars of the Revolutionary War era. She has championed a founder mostly remembered, when remembered at all, as the man who wouldn’t sign the Declaration of Independence<\/a> \u2014 the lawyer and statesman John Dickinson. <\/p>\n \u201cIt has been a constant struggle,\u201d says Calvert, a former associate professor at the University of Kentucky who has written often about Dickinson and is the founder of the John Dickinson Writings Project, which aims to make his works widely available. <\/p>\n For much of the country, the 250th anniversary of independence on Saturday is a time for celebrating and debating the country’s birth. But for Calvert and others, it’s also a moment to challenge the lingering image of a man who at times has been ignored, ridiculed or literally cast aside.<\/p>\n Dickinson, a Maryland native who spent much of his life in Delaware and Pennsylvania, was once regarded as among the most important and inspiring founders. His \u201cLetters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania,\u201d a dozen missives published in the 1760s, were widely read attacks against Britain’s right to tax the colonies that helped give Americans a shared sense of identity and purpose. He even wrote the words to one of the country\u2019s first patriotic anthems, \u201cThe Liberty Song.\u201d<\/p>\n Admirers would call him the \u201cPenman of the Revolution.” <\/p>\n But Dickinson also sought peace with Britain well after the first shots were fired at Lexington and Concord. In July 1775, he helped compose the Olive Branch Petition,<\/a> a call for reconciliation that King George III essentially ignored. When the Continental Congress voted for independence in July 1776, Dickinson and fellow Pennsylvanian Robert Morris abstained. While Morris later signed the Declaration, Dickinson withheld his name.<\/p>\n \u201cHe wasn\u2019t opposed to independence per se, but he thought it should happen gradually and without bloodshed,\u201d Calvert says. <\/p>\n \u201cAmerica wasn\u2019t prepared in any sense, including militarily, and there was no constitution, no foreign allies, and no domestic manufacturing. Neither was there was unanimity on the independence question,” Calvert adds. “But as critical as all these things were, Dickinson\u2019s main concern was that there were no legal protections for the most vulnerable Americans. He was most worried about religious dissenters, particularly the Quakers in Pennsylvania.\u201d <\/p>\n Dickinson’s reputation as a man more of words than of action has long outlasted him. <\/p>\n At the Signers’ Hall exhibit in Philadelphia’s National Constitution Center, the Dickinson statue is placed apart in a corner, sculpted in a contemplative pose. Popular storytellers of the American Revolution, whether documentary maker Ken Burns<\/a> or \u201cHamilton\u201d playwright Lin-Manuel Miranda,<\/a> tend to leave Dickinson out of the narrative. He is otherwise a smug Anglophile in the musical \u201c1776,\u201d and, in the 2008 HBO miniseries about John Adams, he is portrayed as the compromising foil to Adams’ militant righteousness.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s pretty egregious,\u201d Calvert says. \u201cHe is depicted as a scowling and sunken-eyed naysayer of the Patriot cause. We know that he was a compelling and charismatic figure, well-liked among his colleagues and seen as a devoted Patriot leader. He did not wear a wig, don fancy clothes, walk with a cane or speak with a Scottish brogue \u2014 all things added in the show to make him appear aristocratic.\u201d<\/p>\n Once independence was declared, Dickinson did not retire from public life or side with the British, but served in the Pennsylvania and Delaware militias. He helped draft the post-independence Articles of Confederation, supported the U.S. Constitution as a Delaware delegate and served as the president of Delaware and of Pennsylvania. Dickinson and his wife, Mary, were the namesakes for the first college \u2014 based in Carlisle, Pennsylvania \u2014 chartered after the founding of the United States. When he died, in 1808, then-President Thomas Jefferson<\/a> called him \u201cone of the great worthies of the revolution.\u201d<\/p>\n Praising his contributions both before and after independence, Calvert believes Dickinson should be placed alongside Adams, Jefferson and others among the elite of founders. Thomas Donnelly, lead scholar at the Constitution Center, is among those who say Calvert has broadened his understanding of Dickinson (he speculates that the center’s Dickinson statue was meant as a tribute to his \u201cscholarly nature\u201d). <\/p>\n Some historians see it differently. Joseph Ellis, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of \u201cFounding Brothers,\u201d credits Dickinson as the leading voice of resistance in the decade leading up to 1776 but laments his decision not \u201cto take the last step.\u201d Fellow Pulitzer winner Jack Rakove says that Dickinson\u2019s thinking in 1776 was a “quirk of his conscientious political personality\u201d that shouldn’t diminish his other achievements. <\/p>\n But he still wouldn’t rank him in the first tier. Instead, he places Dickinson just below, alongside such figures as Benjamin Rush and John Jay. Says Rakove: \u201cPerhaps his qualms of conscience in 1776 have affected his reputation.”<\/p>\n Dickinson himself would lament that his opposition to the Declaration was a \u201cfinishing blow\u201d to his \u201cdiminished popularity.\u201d <\/p>\n Adams was among his detractors, dismissing him as a \u201cpiddling genius whose fame has been trumpeted so loudly.\u201d In the 1840s, Calvert says, historian George Bancroft helped seal Dickinson’s legacy by condemning him for how he \u201cdulled the resentment of the people, and paralyzed the manly impulse of self-sacrificing courage.\u201d<\/p>\n Calvert has not been alone in defending Dickinson. His other advocates range from the late conservative commentator William Murchison, author of a 2013 biography that cites Calvert’s research, to such historians-Dickinson Project editors as Ian Iverson and Nathan R. Kozuskanich. Calvert even praises the creators of \u201cSouth Park\u201d for an episode aired in 2003, during the Iraq War. As supporters and protesters clash, Cartman travels back to 1776, witnesses the independence debate and finds parallels to the present.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s the only pop culture representation of Dickinson I\u2019ve seen that portrays him as being motivated by principle \u2014 that we shouldn\u2019t found a country based on war,\u201d Calvert says. <\/p>\n \u201cHere Dickinson is the forefather of those antiwar protesters,” Calvert says. “Whether he would have gone so far as to say that the reasons for the Revolution were trumped up, I don\u2019t know. Maybe. In any case, there is a lot to like!\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n