\n<\/p>\n
PORTLAND, Maine — <\/span>The Supreme Court has declined to hear the case of a lobster fisherman who alleged the government requiring commercial fishing boats to use electronic tracking devices amounts to unreasonable search and seizure.<\/p>\n Maine lobster fisherman Frank Thompson sued<\/a> after his state began requiring all federally permitted lobstermen to install GPS trackers on their boats to collect data that will help manage the industry. Thompson appealed to the high court after losing at the appeals court level.<\/p>\n The Supreme Court formally denied Thompson’s petition on Oct. 5. The decision allows the state to collect \u201ccritically important\u201d data, said Carl Wilson, commissioner of the Maine Department of Marine Resources.<\/p>\n \u201cIt will inform the lobster stock assessment, enhance offshore enforcement, and support better decision-making in a range of federal management contexts,\u201d Wilson said in a statement.<\/p>\n Thompson’s lawsuit raised questions about the limits of government surveillance and the ways commercial fisheries are managed. Pacific Legal Foundation, which represented Thompson, said in a Tuesday statement that \u201cthe fight over whether the government can use industry regulations to sidestep Fourth Amendment protections is far from over.\u201d<\/p>\n The foundation said in a blog post that the court’s decision means some 1,200 Maine lobster fishermen who hold federal permits can be tracked. However, the legal battle over government surveillance isn’t over, the foundation said.<\/p>\n Environmental groups that have called for more commercial fishing surveillance cheered the decision. Some have said the industry needs to be monitored more closely to protect rare North Atlantic right whales<\/a>, which are vulnerable to getting entangled in fishing gear. Others have said the declining lobster population<\/a> needs to be more closely monitored.<\/p>\n \u201cNew England\u2019s lobster population has declined dangerously,\u201d said Conservation Law Foundation associate attorney Sarah Shahabi. \u201cTracking lobster boats provides the timely and accurate data that regulators need. This decision is a valuable step toward appropriately managing this iconic species.\u201d<\/p>\n Most of the U.S. lobster catch comes to the docks in Maine, where lobster fishing is a key piece of the state’s history and culture. Catch at the docks is often worth more than $500 million annually.<\/p>\n The Supreme Court’s decision not to hear Thompson’s case was one of two federal court rulings against lobster fishermen this month. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also ruled against a group of fishing industry businesses and trade organizations that sued the Monterey Bay Aquarium<\/a> in California. The plaintiffs sued the aquarium for defamation after its Seafood Watch program placed American and Canadian lobster on its do-no-eat \u201cred list.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n