\n<\/p>\n
One shaped and delivered the language of feminism. The other rejected the label but showed how feminism can be done: with a microphone dusted in rhinestones, and without apology.<\/p>\n
Gloria Steinem<\/a> and Dolly Parton<\/a> embodied two towering versions of the same idea: that women should know themselves well enough to make their own choices about matters intimate and societal. Their deaths eight days apart sent a double dose of grief around the world and across generations as many women (and some men!) asked who would take their places at the forefront of women’s rights. <\/p>\n Steinem, overtly political, went undercover as a Playboy bunny to deliver an expos\u00e9, founded Ms. Magazine and spent the rest of her life urging women to support each other. Parton, on the other hand, defined herself as a larger-than-life daughter of the American South who told stories with music and included everybody \u2014 but refused to play politics or call herself a feminist<\/a>. <\/p>\n \u201cDolly taught us to dream big. Gloria taught us to speak up,” wrote DeMond B Nason, a New York City singer. \u201cBoth reminded us that a woman could walk into a world that told her who she was supposed to be \u2014 and simply decide to become something else.\u201d<\/p>\n Parton didn’t say so, but Steinem insisted more than three decades ago that the pair fit together under the same feminist flag. <\/p>\n \u201cIf feminism means each of us finding your unique power, and helping other women do the same, Dolly Parton certainly has done both,\u201d Steinem wrote in 1987, when Ms. Magazine named the singer one of its “Women of the Year.” <\/p>\n Many shared the sense that Steinem and Parton belonged together.<\/p>\n \u201cBoth believed in women: in our ability to decide who we are, make our own choices, take care of one another and shape the world around us,\u201d wrote Swati Narayan in a column for American Kahani, an online news outlet for Indian and South Asian Americans.<\/p>\n Between Parton’s death on Aug. 25 and Steinem’s on Sept. 2, Ms. Magazine re-ran Steinem’s essay<\/a> with an editor’s note: \u201cSteinem celebrated Parton not only as a gifted songwriter and magnetic performer, but as a shrewd businessperson who transformed femininity into a source of humor and power \u2014 and used her success to lift up working women, poor communities and the mountain people of her native Tennessee.\u201d <\/p>\n The embrace wasn’t mutual, at least not publicly. And that, Parton acknowledged, was by design.<\/p>\n \u201cI don\u2019t do politics. I have too many fans on both sides of the fence,\u201d she said in 2019 on \u201cDolly Parton’s America,\u201d Radiolab’s podcast. \u201cOf course,” she added, “I have my opinion about everything, but I learned years ago to keep your mouth shut about things.\u201d<\/p>\n The star was asked directly whether she thought of herself as a feminist.<\/p>\n \u201cNo, I do not,\u201d she said flatly, later explaining that she did not want to be associated with what she viewed as political extremes even as she advocated for women and their opportunities. <\/p>\n \u201cI do not like extreme things,\u201d she said. \u201cI don\u2019t believe in crucifying a whole group just because a few people have made mistakes. To me when you say just the word \u2018feminist\u2019 is like, \u2018I hate all men.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n Parton was clear, though, that her lyrics were intended to shine light on women\u2019s hardships and the realities of a world that the superstar agreed was dominated by men. She wrote about teenage pregnancy, abortion and adoption in \u201cDown from Dover.\u201d She supported equal pay (See: \u201c9 to 5,\u201d the movie and the song). One of her most famous songs is called, \u201cJust Because I’m a Woman.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cPeople say to me, \u2018Well, wasn\u2019t it a man\u2019s world back when you got in the business.\u2019 I said, \u2018It sure was, and honey, I had a ball,\u2019\u201d she said at a 2019 awards show. \u201cI have never met a man that I didn\u2019t like, and I\u2019ve never met a man whose ass I couldn\u2019t kick if he didn\u2019t treat me with the right respect.\u201d<\/p>\n She just didn\u2019t use words like \u201coppression\u201d or \u201cpatriarchy.\u201d And unlike Steinem, Parton didn’t endorse political candidates. Asked on CNN during the 2016 presidential campaign whether she preferred Republican Donald Trump or Democrat Hillary Clinton, she replied: “I think they\u2019re both nuts.”<\/p>\n Onstage at the 2017 Emmys, Parton demurred when fellow \u201c9 to 5\u201d costars Lily Tomlin and Jane Fonda took a thinly veiled shot at Trump. Parton pivoted to humor.<\/p>\n \u201cThey\u2019re Lily and they\u2019re Jane and I\u2019m Dolly,” she said later. \u201cSo they did their thing, I did mine.\u201d<\/p>\n Feminism splintered under the pressure of public policy debates over such issues as abortion and the rejection of Clinton in the 2016 elections, the rise of Trump and the modern-day emergence of identity politics. <\/p>\n Steinem’s version of feminism<\/a> today is more aligned<\/a> with Democrats at a time when, at least for now, the country has swung Republican. Steinem lived to see the Supreme Court overturn the 1973 ruling Roe v. Wade,<\/a> eliminating the constitutional right to abortion, a pillar of the 1960s feminist movement she embodied. The Equal Rights Amendment remains unratified. And Americans have yet to elect a woman president.<\/p>\n So if you’re an opponent of abortion rights or if you voted for Trump, can you still be a feminist in 2026? And would you want to be called that in public or on social media? To the end, Steinem insisted it wasn’t the label that mattered. What counted as feminist was whether a woman knew herself well enough to make her own choices rather than be defined as the daughter or wife of a man.<\/p>\n But partisanship surfaced even in the ritual public mourning for the two women. <\/p>\n Parton’s passing touched off an immediate expression of grief from sources ranging from Trump to her fans in the LGBTQ+ community<\/a>. Trump ordered<\/a> flags to be flown at half-staff as a show of \u201crespect\u201d for her. <\/p>\n In contrast, there was no such rush to recognize Steinem beyond her liberal and centrist constituency, even from conservatives who had expressed respect for her accomplishments as an influential historical figure.<\/p>\n Their silence two days after Steinem’s death contrasted with the outpouring of grief, thanks and respect for Steinem from leading figures on the left, particularly of her generation. Hillary Clinton, who also saluted Parton, said Steinem’s activism was built on optimism despite abundant roadblocks for women.<\/p>\n \u201cThe lived experience became much more real and applicable to our entire society when Gloria began to point it out,\u201d Clinton posted. <\/p>\n For her part, Steinem said for years that she’s using her torch to light others. “If we each have a torch, there\u2019s a lot more light,\u201d she told the National Press Club in 2013.<\/p>\n Social media offered evidence that supporters of both women would pass it on. Liz Webster, an American hair and makeup artist living in Germany, called Steinem and Parton \u201ctwo very different women who shaped the way I saw what a woman could be.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cFeminism will never be just a word to me. The freedoms we have are incredibly new,\u201d she wrote on Facebook. “So be the example. Use your freedom. Protect it. And make damn sure the women coming after us have even more.\u201d<\/p>\n ___<\/p>\n Kellman reported from London; Barrow reported from Atlanta. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n