\n<\/p>\n
NEW YORK — <\/span>The potential unraveling<\/a> of a fragile truce between Iran and the United States renewed anxiety Wednesday over whether fuel prices would go back up if sustained fighting kept oil tankers from traveling through the Persian Gulf. <\/p>\n Oil prices rose to their highest point in weeks after President Donald Trump declared the U.S. ceasefire with Iran over, responding to Iranian attacks on commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz and on American military sites in other Gulf nations. Costlier crude oil could lead to costlier gas station fill-ups as drivers in many countries were getting a break<\/a> from elevated prices brought on by the war.<\/p>\n \u201cTanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has essentially stopped, which tells you more about risk perception right now than any statement from Washington or Tehran,” said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy, in an email. \u201cOil markets reacted quickly to the renewed geopolitical risk.” <\/p>\n U.S. gasoline prices increased slightly Wednesday to an average of $3.80 for a gallon of regular, up from $3.79 the day before, but still well below the month-ago average of $4.16, according to motor club federation AAA.<\/p>\n Crude oil makes up the bulk of the price of gasoline, so when oil prices rise, gasoline eventually follows. But it can take weeks for consumers to feel the full impacts. That’s because refiners make gasoline with oil purchased in advance. The finished product then has to travel through a system of pipelines and trucks to reach gas station pumps. <\/p>\n Gas station owners set prices at the pump, and to stay competitive, they sometimes absorb the impact of higher oil prices instead of immediately passing it along to customers.<\/p>\n To suppress high oil prices during the war, the U.S. and other countries released oil from their emergency stockpiles starting in March. But those stockpiles won\u2019t last forever.<\/p>\n The U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve held 319.5 million barrels as of July 3. The last time the inventory was that low was in 1983, when the reserve was initially being filled up.<\/p>\n \u201cUnfortunately, the drawdown of strategic stocks means that there is a lot less ammunition in Trump\u2019s holster,\u201d said Michael Lynch, a distinguished fellow at Energy Policy Research Institute in Amherst, Massachusetts.<\/p>\n A barrel of U.S. benchmark crude was selling for $75.80 on Wednesday, the highest price in more than two weeks. Brent crude, the international standard, climbed close to $79 per barrel, its highest level since June 19. <\/p>\n The market reaction “highlights how sensitive prices remain to any escalation around the strait, given its role as a critical transit route for global oil flows,\u201d Leon said.<\/p>\n A day after the U.S. accused Iran of striking three commercial vessels<\/a> and revoked the country’s ability to openly sell crude oil on the world market, some advised the shipping industry to reconsider whether it was safe to send crewed ships through the Strait of Hormuz<\/a> \u2014 and the wider Middle East.<\/p>\n International Maritime Organization Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez condemned attacks on ships in the strait.<\/p>\n \u201cAs long as the safety and security of crews cannot be assured, I urge flag states, shipowners, operators and all relevant authorities to avoid exposing seafarers to unnecessary danger by transiting the strait,\u201d Dominguez said Wednesday. \u201cThe situation in the region remains volatile.\u201d<\/p>\n Some traffic traversed the strait on Tuesday, according to data and analytics company Kpler, which verified 41 crossings compared to 36 on Monday. It was unclear if the crossings happened before or after the strikes. Some vessels also are going \u201cdark\u201d to pass through the strait and not broadcasting their locations, further complicating a complete count. <\/p>\n With the central route through the strait uncrossable due to mines, ships have been using two other routes, the smaller northern route, which goes through Iranian waters, and the southern route, which goes through Omani waters. The three ships struck Tuesday appeared to be using the Omani route.<\/a><\/p>\n An economist at advisory firm Oxford Economics said the ceasefire probably would continue to be on-and-off and Washington and Tehran could still deescalate the latest tensions instead of returning to war.<\/p>\n \u201cThe question is whether the latest developments merely represent a bump in the road or if we\u2019re emerging from the \u2018eye of the storm,\u2018\u201d Ben May, the firm’s director of global macroeconomic research, wrote in a research note. \u201cWhile Trump said negotiations with Iran were a \u2018waste of time\u2019, he maintained an off-ramp by noting that U.S. negotiators would continue talks with Iran, suggesting the truce hasn\u2019t been irrevocably broken.\u201d<\/p>\n The new doubts about the Strait of Hormuz came after two of the biggest shipping companies, Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd, announced Monday that their Gemini Corporation joint partnership would gradually resume service in the Suez Canal, which was paused due to attacks in the Red Sea by Yemen\u2019s Houthis<\/a>.<\/p>\n Recent stability in the Middle East created the conditions for the companies’ decision, but “the recent deterioration could put this resumption in jeopardy once again,\u201d said Judah Levine, head of research at freight booking platform Freightos. \u201cThe said.<\/p>\n Hapag-Lloyd said in a Wednesday statement that it made the joint decision after \u201cthorough assessments of the security situation in the Red Sea area\u201d and \u201cif the situation changes or deteriorates, contingency plans are in place.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n