\n<\/p>\n
President Donald Trump\u2019s<\/a> administration is threatening to withhold some federal funding from states that don’t make changes to voting practices and is warning state election officials that they face arrest if they don\u2019t remove noncitizens from voter rolls.<\/p>\n Letters to states and grant application details are the latest in a line of actions by Trump\u2019s administration to shape details of running elections<\/a> that have long been the job of states. <\/p>\n Courts have largely rejected the administration\u2019s previous efforts, which reflect untrue claims<\/a> about widespread voting fraud<\/a> and come less than four months ahead of crucial midterm elections where Democrats seek to take control of one or both chambers of Congress and check Trump\u2019s power.<\/p>\n \u201cThe overall point is that Trump is trying to use whatever levers of power and persuasive power that he might have to try to interfere with how states and localities are going to conduct the 2026 election,\u201d said Rick Hasen, a UCLA law professor and the director of the Safeguarding Democracy Project. \u201cSome of this is aimed at changing how the rules are conducted. Some of it appears to be aimed at undermining voter confidence in the integrity of the election process.\u201d<\/p>\n In letters sent Tuesday, to election officials for all 50 states and the District of Columbia \u2014 often secretaries of state \u2014 the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division said they and other election administrators could face criminal charges if they knowingly allow nonvoters to vote or remain on voting rolls.<\/p>\n It also called on the states to tell the federal government within five days how they intend to comply with the law.<\/p>\n Derek Muller, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame who specializes in election law, said it\u2019s not clear the 50-state letter means anything except to restate some parts of the law, with a request to follow up, \u201cwhich I\u2019m sure many states will ignore.\u201d<\/p>\n The letter also warns that anyone who knowingly and willfully gives false information in registering to vote or voting would face criminal prosecution.<\/p>\n A Federal Emergency Management Agency antiterrorism grant announcement in June includes a list of election-related requirements, saying that 20% of grants for states and urban areas would be withheld until they comply.<\/p>\n The program includes more than $1 billion for states and local and tribal governments for a variety of programs aimed at preventing terror at crowded places, online, with border security \u2014 and around elections. FEMA expects to award 56 grants.<\/p>\n \u201cRecipients can ensure that their efforts contribute to a secure, transparent, and resilient electoral process, thereby reinforcing public trust and the integrity of democratic institutions,\u201d the grant announcement says, noting that securing election infrastructure is a national security priority.<\/p>\n The list of items for states includes verifying the citizenship of all registered voters and election workers.<\/p>\n Places that use electronic voting systems that use bar codes or QR codes to count votes would have to submit plans to switch to hand-marked paper ballots. Every jurisdiction would have to show it audits results.<\/p>\n UCLA’s Hasen said it could be difficult even for states that want to comply. It’s too close to the midterm election to make some of the changes, he said, and some would require state legislatures to pass new laws.<\/p>\n The White House on Wednesday referred questions to FEMA, which did not immediately respond to an interview request.<\/p>\n Some states are pushing back, while others are defending the latest actions.<\/p>\n They seem to be breaking along party lines.<\/p>\n Oregon\u2019s secretary of state, Democrat Tobias Read, accused the Justice Department of \u201cknocking on our door again with more threats and no evidence to back up their fever dreams about non-existent voter fraud.\u201d<\/p>\n Oregon elections are secure, accurate, and fair, he said, adding that he isn\u2019t \u201cintimidated by political threats or manufactured controversy.\u201d<\/p>\n The Michigan secretary of state\u2019s office, headed by Democrat Jocelyn Benson, said it has discussed its work repeatedly with the Justice Department and in public statements, congressional hearings and court testimony \u2014 information that it said \u201cis either in the DOJ\u2019s possession or easy reach.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWe will be happy to provide it again to help address any confusion,\u201d the office said in a statement.<\/p>\n In a statement, Ohio Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose defended the Justice Department\u2019s missive to states, saying it\u2019s reminding them of their legal obligation regarding election integrity. A lot of states aren\u2019t taking it seriously, he said without giving examples or citing evidence. He said Ohio has worked with the federal government to ensure that its voter rolls are accurate and that only U.S. citizens vote.<\/p>\n Georgia’s secretary of state’s office says the state has already taken many of the actions required in the FEMA grant, including a citizenship audit of voter rolls.<\/p>\n Trump has repeatedly and wrongly asserted that fraud cost him reelection in 2020, and his administration has put forth a series of policies and actions aimed at how elections are run.<\/p>\n In recent days, courts have rejected the Justice Department’s effort to collect the names and contact information for every election worker<\/a> in Georgia in the 2020 election and others trying to force New Hampshire<\/a> and Pennsylvania to turn over detailed information about registered voters. With those rulings, the federal government has lost similar cases more than 10 times around its requests for details from 30 states and the District of Columbia.<\/p>\n Last week, a group of Democratic governors asked the U.S. Postal Service<\/a> to withdraw its proposed rule seeking to implement an order from Trump to create a list of eligible voters \u2014 and potentially limit who can receive a ballot in the mail. A court previously put the order on hold<\/a>, saying it was unconstitutional.<\/p>\n Also last week, the Supreme Court rebuked Trump and ruled that states can count mailed ballots<\/a> that arrive after Election Day.<\/p>\n ___<\/p>\n Associated Press reporters Gabriela Aoun Angueira, Bill Barrow, Kate Brumback and Josh Kelety contributed to this article.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n